Skip to content


Why Multiculturalism is a False Dream

french-flag

Perhaps one of the greatest realizations of the beginning of the 21st century will be the primacy of liberty over equality. For all the all the social experiments and engineering enforced by governments of all stripes aimed at “fairness” and “stability” none have found their success in reality. From the little red books of the East to the hijab bans of the West, state sponsored intrusions into sociocultural practices have proven to be a disaster.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel began by stating that her country’s attempts at multiculturalism “failed, totally.” The UK’s PM David Cameron agreed and endorsed a “more active, muscular liberalism.” Most recently, French President Nicolas Sarkozy joined in concurring that, “clearly yes, it is a failure.” There has been much backlash, particularly in France, where tensions with French Muslims have been a recurring theme of Sarkozy’s presidency. Several French Muslim news sites, such as SaphirNews, brushed his comments off as “hunting for votes on the far-right.”

Perhaps nowhere is this failure better seen than in Singapore which created a national fantasy of the “3 Multis” – multiracial, multi-religious, multiethnic. This is all predicated on the racial classification system that divides people into one of four categories: Chinese, Malay, Indian, Other. Not only is it not allowed to discuss race or religion, the government’s policies actively promote a sort of ethnic cleansing and eugenics-style apartheid to create a Utopian society where the nearly all citizens are college educated, non-Muslim, and Chinese. Rather than basking in the diversity of its population, Lee Kuan Yew just wanted to make everyone be like him. These socio-political fantasies, whether on the Left or the Right, create a dystopia where individuals’ differences are devalued and ressentiment thrives among anyone who can consider herself to be a minority.

Even Julia Kristeva, French author and cultural theorist, considered to be an icon of the feminism and multiculturalism movements, has abandoned the political correctness of such false dreams. Her 2001 interview with the New York Times states that “Ms. Kristeva believes that the group identity adopted by some feminist, gay and ethnic leaders as a pedestal for their revindications is outdated and even, in her word, ”totalitarian,” that freedom of the individual should take precedence over communitarianism, that political assertion of sexual, ethnic and religious identities eventually erodes democracy.”

While it took ten years for the leaders of Western Europe to come to the same conclusion, it hopefully won’t be as long for the people of Egypt and Singapore when they get the chance to change their governments (and societies) this year.

Do you agree? Vehemently disagree? Let us know in the comments.

[via AFPReuters; image by Michael Schmalenstroer]


FOLLOW 21CB ON:

TAGS:

You'll also like:

from → Featured, Politics, Society

  • Crystal


    This just makes it abundantly clear to me that we’re living history and that to make progress is a constant struggle. If there are French Muslims praying on the streets outside overcrowded mosques, MAYBE somebody should build more mosques. I realize this is easier said than done, and yes, there are lots more Christian establishments in Europe given its history, but that doesn’t mean these countries’ leaders should be completely opposed to change and to opening their country to other religions. No one citizen should have more of a right or entitlement to be in his/her country than another.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Multiculturalism is Dead | Nicholas Sarkozy | 21CB -- Topsy.com

  • Esther Tran-Le


    I think the word of choice is most puzzling/interesting. In the case of Germany, Britain, and France, “integration” would be more appropriate. I’ve been reading the French papers’ account of Sarkozy’s remarks. The thin line between “multiculturalism” and “integration” is clear and tangible, too bad politicians and today’s media are drama-addicts.

  • Jackie


    Nathan, you make a great point about the problem in Singapore. You should check out the job websites requesting for people of a specific ethnicity/race. I’m sure they know that sort of profiling is not allowed. Nevertheless, they manage to get away with that kind of behavior. Undoubtedly, every country has its pros and cons. It always seems unfortunate when culture diversity is a problem. I live in California probably one of the most diverse states in America and even though there are still problems with discrimination. Overall, I think America is doing a decent job and it would be parochial to think that we’re worse off than other countries as some people have suggested. We still have opportunities. Anyway, Singapore is sort of like a labyrinth. You can sort of spot the problems, but it’s gonna take a lot of work. I can’t picture an Egypt situation taking place any time soon though. Despite the “fantasies” which you have mentioned in your article, they have a strong sense of national pride. I lived in Singapore for six years (8-14). I consider it a second home and have gone back to visit over the years. Definitely an interesting little city/state. Esther, in the case of Germany, “integration” does seem appropriate. I will be moving there in June after obtaining my undergrad degree. I suppose it will be an exciting experience for an Asian-American living in Europe. haha Politicians and media have always been drama-addicts.